TeamWhat We DoCase StudiesToolsBook a consultation →
CASE STUDY. ENGAGING NETWORKS. NONPROFIT eCRM · ADVOCACY · FUNDRAISING

Positioned.Trained.

Engaging Networks is the digital engagement platform behind serious advocacy, fundraising, and eCRM programs. iExcel clarified the positioning and mapped the go-forward growth plan.

Engagement
Strategic advisory · GTM enablement
Scope
Positioning · Training · ABM · Digital snapshot
Buyers served
Nonprofits · Advocacy orgs · Campaigns
Category
Fundraising · Advocacy · Email + MA
Community advocacy — the buyer's world, mission in motion
// ADVOCACY · FUNDRAISING · eCRM
Chapter 01 · The Setup

Serious platform. Unclear position.

Engaging Networks is a digital engagement platform for nonprofits, advocacy organizations, and campaigns — eCRM, fundraising, advocacy actions, email marketing, marketing automation, and peer-to-peer all in one operating layer. The product is real. The customers — international NGOs, national advocacy groups, human-rights and environmental orgs — are the kind that ship serious programs on it.

The engagement wasn't about running ads. It was about the layer underneath the ads: how the platform got positioned, how the internal team talked about it, how the go-to-market surface was structured, and what a modern demand-gen build would look like on top of a category that hadn't fully committed to one.

iExcel ran the strategic advisory. A digital brand + acquisition snapshot to size the surface. A messaging workshop to clarify the story. A digital acquisition crash course to level up the internal team. An ABM framework and audience research to point the growth motion at the right accounts. And later a RevOps + demand-gen proposal for the infrastructure underneath it all.

Nonprofit team collaborating — the operator inside the platform
Chapter 01 · The category
Chapter 02 · The Snapshot

The digital footprint. At engagement start.

Before the workshop, before the training, before the plan — a snapshot. iExcel ran the digital brand and acquisition audit across search visibility, social reach, backlink profile, and owned assets. The four quadrants below are the baseline the growth motion was measured against. No performance claim. Just the surface as it stood — the read the leadership team needed before it committed to a spend.

// DIGITAL SNAPSHOT BOARD · ENGAGING NETWORKS Baseline · Engagement Start
01 · Search Presence Google · Bing

What the market types.

Domain search results17,800
Brand-name search results20,600
Monthly search-ad views5
02 · Social Reach LinkedIn

Where the buyer lives.

LinkedIn accounts (staff + alumni)481
LinkedIn groups mentioning brand154
LinkedIn job listings24
03 · Backlink Profile Moz

What the web already says.

Moz Domain Authority48
Total backlinks77,174
Unique linking domains1,455
Dofollow backlinks92%
Dofollow linking domains67%
04 · Owned Assets Sitemap · G2 · Capterra

What we control.

Website pages in sitemap513
G2 mentions2
Capterra mentions8
// SOURCE · MOZ · GOOGLE · LINKEDIN · G2 · CAPTERRA · SITEMAP AUDIT
48
Moz Domain Authority · Baseline
The CEO-supplied scope on the audit — DA=48 is a defensible starting authority for a nonprofit-SaaS build, above the mid-range most category peers sit at.
Chapter 03 · The Crash Course

Digital acquisition. On the whiteboard.

Before we could hand the team a plan, they needed the shared vocabulary to run it. iExcel scoped and delivered a digital acquisition crash course — a working session on how a modern demand-gen program actually operates for a category-defining B2B nonprofit-SaaS. Not a stage-and-slides pitch. A working reference the internal team could still open six months later.

The curriculum ran across the full digital funnel — traffic generation, CRO and A/B testing, activation and onboarding, nurture and notifications, analytics and tracking, SEO, paid search, paid social, display and retargeting, email, earned media and PR, review-site presence, and ABM fundamentals. Each block anchored to how it applies to a nonprofit-SaaS buying committee, not to a generic B2C funnel.

The output wasn't training-theater. It was a working literacy across the leadership + marketing team — the level of fluency required to review a paid-media plan without needing an agency to translate it.

Workshop training session — the crash course in motion
Chapter 03 · The working session
// MODULE 01

Digital funnel strategy

How the top, middle, and bottom of the funnel actually work for a nonprofit-SaaS buying committee — HR-of-marketing patterns applied.

// MODULE 02

Traffic generation

Channel-level roles — organic, paid, referral, email, earned. What each is good at and what it's not.

// MODULE 03

CRO + A/B testing

How to build a test roadmap, size a test, and read a result honestly. Statistical significance without the theatre.

// MODULE 04

Activation + onboarding

The user-journey layer — activation events, in-app nurture, notifications, and the metrics that actually predict retention.

// MODULE 05

Analytics + reporting

Planning, tracking, reporting cadence, and the read layer leadership can point at. What belongs in a weekly review vs. a quarterly one.

// MODULE 06

SEO

Category-and-buyer-anchored keyword strategy, on-page fundamentals, and how organic compounds against a paid program instead of competing with it.

// MODULE 07

Paid search + paid social

Google, Bing, LinkedIn, Meta — where a nonprofit-SaaS buyer actually is, and how to target intent without wasting nonprofit budget.

// MODULE 08

Display + retargeting

The warm-audience layer — when it earns and when it's a vanity line item. Anchored to intent, not impressions.

// MODULE 09

Email + earned media

Owned email as the durable channel. PR, reviews on G2 and Capterra, directories, and how the earned surface feeds the paid one.

Hands together — the mission-driven read
// THE READ · CHAPTER 03
"A nonprofit-SaaS team doesn't need an agency to write its media plan. It needs the literacy to review one."
— Engagement Recap · Engaging Networks × iExcel
Chapter 04 · Messaging Workshop

The story. On the record.

The platform was serious. The story wasn't yet. iExcel ran a messaging workshop against the classic four-language problem — the way the internal team talked about the product, the way the market talked about the category, the way the customer talked about the pain, and the way competitors talked about themselves. Four dialects. One brand had to reconcile them.

The workshop surfaced the through-line — Engaging Networks is a digital engagement platform / eCRM built for advocacy, fundraising, email marketing, marketing automation, peer-to-peer, and deep customization. Not a general-purpose CRM with a nonprofit skin. A category-anchored platform whose customers ship serious programs on it.

The output was a positioning brief the sales team could quote from and a message-house the marketing team could source campaign copy against — the same story, in every language, on the record.

Community organizing meeting — the messaging surface in the wild
Chapter 04 · Four languages, one story
// INTERNAL LANGUAGE
How the team already talks about it. eCRM, digital engagement platform, advocacy actions, email marketing automation, peer-to-peer fundraising, deep customization. Product-anchored, feature-fluent, expert.
// MARKET LANGUAGE
How the analyst reports and the category conversation frame it. Nonprofit CRM, advocacy tech, digital fundraising platform, supporter engagement. Analyst-anchored, comparative, positioning-fluent.
// CUSTOMER LANGUAGE
How the buyer talks about the pain in her own words. "Get our advocates to act." "Grow our email list." "Run our campaign end-to-end." "Report to the board on what actually moved." Outcome-anchored, mission-fluent.
// COMPETITOR LANGUAGE
How the category tries to be positioned against. Broad-CRM adjacencies, all-in-one nonprofit suites, single-purpose advocacy tools. The gap Engaging Networks owns — serious, category-anchored, customizable — got mapped explicitly.
Chapter 05 · The ABM Framework

Right accounts. Right signals.

Once the story was on the record, the growth plan had a target. iExcel scoped an ABM framework, LinkedIn audience research, and candidate/prospect research — the go-forward motion that would take the positioning to the accounts most likely to buy it. Four workstreams, one operating layer.

01 // ACCOUNT SELECTION

Right-fit accounts

Named-account tiers built off the CEO-supplied ICP — advocacy orgs, national campaigns, and mission-driven nonprofits with the program complexity Engaging Networks was built for. Not a 10,000-line list. A defensible one.

02 // LINKEDIN AUDIENCE RESEARCH

The buyer, on LinkedIn

Director-of-Digital, VP-of-Advocacy, Head-of-Fundraising, Executive Director. The buyer titles mapped, the account-tier overlays scoped, the audience sizes documented — the paid-social plan had a target before the media plan touched it. The qualifying matrix ran deep and narrow: just 3.96% of the targeting combinations built returned a viable audience, the filter that kept the plan pointed at real accounts instead of noise.

03 // PROSPECT + CANDIDATE RESEARCH

Signals, not surface

Named-prospect research against the tiered account list — engagement-program hires, digital-transformation posts, RFP signals, category-relevant leadership moves. The signal layer the outbound + ABM motion could act on.

04 // GO-FORWARD PLAN

RevOps + demand-gen proposal

The follow-on scope — a CRM + reporting infrastructure and webinar-anchored demand-gen build tied back to the messaging house and the ABM tiers. The infrastructure the standing weekly review would eventually run on.

3.96%
Viable Audience Ratio · LinkedIn Research
Of the full LinkedIn targeting matrix built for the ABM program, only 3.96% of combinations returned a non-zero audience — the narrow, defensible slice the paid-social plan actually ran against.
// LINKING-DOMAIN AUTHORITY · THE OWNED BASELINE
67%
Of every unique domain linking to the platform, most passed authority through a genuine dofollow link — the owned-authority baseline the growth plan inherited on day one.
— Moz Domain Audit · Engagement Start
Chapter 06 · The Read

Why this engagement matters.

Engaging Networks is the template for a specific kind of B2B SaaS engagement — a category-defining platform in a serious space, with a real product and real customers, whose next step wasn't more ad spend. It was clearer positioning, a literate internal team, a defensible ABM plan, and a demand-gen infrastructure worth building against.

iExcel ran the strategic advisory layer that most agencies skip — the messaging workshop, the digital snapshot, the crash course, the ABM framework, the audience research, the go-forward proposal. Not campaign theatre. The operating layer campaigns run on.

For any B2B SaaS in a mission-driven category — nonprofit tech, advocacy, education, healthcare — with a story that still has to be reconciled across four languages and a team that deserves to review the plan without an interpreter, this is the shape of the work.

92%
Dofollow Backlink Ratio · Baseline
CEO-supplied audit metric. A 92% dofollow rate is unusually high for the category — the owned-authority surface any SEO + PR motion inherits on day one.
Fundraiser event — the outcome the platform serves
Chapter 06 · The mission the platform serves
Mission-driven work — the compounding surface
// THE COMPOUND
"Advocacy platforms don't scale on ad spend. They scale on positioning that a serious buyer can point at and repeat."
— Engagement Recap · Engaging Networks × iExcel

Positioning first. Then the growth.

A messaging house the sales team can quote from. A digital snapshot that sizes the surface. An ABM plan pointed at the right accounts. Book a 15-minute sanity check on your setup — we'll tell you what's under-built and what to do about it.

Book a 15-min sanity check →
Book →